<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What do you mean, most submissions are rejected on page 1?  Isn&#8217;t that a trifle&#8230;judgmental?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.annemini.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.annemini.com/?p=2158</link>
	<description>Anne Mini&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 06:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.annemini.com/?p=2158&#038;cpage=1#comment-30879</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 04:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annemini.com/?p=2158#comment-30879</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t really claim credit for the list part; I was essentially just a transcriptionist.  Kind of stunning to see &#039;em all laid out in a row, isn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t really claim credit for the list part; I was essentially just a transcriptionist.  Kind of stunning to see &#8216;em all laid out in a row, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun Attwood</title>
		<link>http://www.annemini.com/?p=2158&#038;cpage=1#comment-30877</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun Attwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 19:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annemini.com/?p=2158#comment-30877</guid>
		<description>What a great list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a great list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily Murdoch</title>
		<link>http://www.annemini.com/?p=2158&#038;cpage=1#comment-26202</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily Murdoch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 20:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annemini.com/?p=2158#comment-26202</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Anne!

Every step of this process has been a huge learning experience for me, and it&#039;s been writing bloggers like you, so generous with their time and knowledge that have made all the difference. 

From my query letter to my synopsis (you have *amazing* posts on the synopsis, too) to formatting for submissions, I wouldn&#039;t be where I am today without the kindness of writers in the know.

Thank you for the luck! It&#039;s so exciting! And, no matter how it goes with this present batch of submissions, it&#039;s the thrill of a lifetime to (finally!) be in the game. 
 
Em</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Anne!</p>
<p>Every step of this process has been a huge learning experience for me, and it&#8217;s been writing bloggers like you, so generous with their time and knowledge that have made all the difference. </p>
<p>From my query letter to my synopsis (you have *amazing* posts on the synopsis, too) to formatting for submissions, I wouldn&#8217;t be where I am today without the kindness of writers in the know.</p>
<p>Thank you for the luck! It&#8217;s so exciting! And, no matter how it goes with this present batch of submissions, it&#8217;s the thrill of a lifetime to (finally!) be in the game. </p>
<p>Em</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.annemini.com/?p=2158&#038;cpage=1#comment-26200</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annemini.com/?p=2158#comment-26200</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re welcome, Em -- and good luck with your submissions!  My fingers are multiply crossed for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re welcome, Em &#8212; and good luck with your submissions!  My fingers are multiply crossed for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily Murdoch</title>
		<link>http://www.annemini.com/?p=2158&#038;cpage=1#comment-26196</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily Murdoch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annemini.com/?p=2158#comment-26196</guid>
		<description>Big thank yous for this post. A writing friend of mine pointed me to it, and I was shocked (like the writers at the conference) that there could be such similarity of ideas across writers, let alone in the first page.

Rather than sighing, it was refreshing to learn what&#039;s frowned upon in a business that doesn&#039;t offer much in the way of fedback on rejections. 

I immediately made changes to my manuscript&#039;s first page. For example, instead of my MC dying and &quot;waking up&quot; in Heaven, now she dies and &quot;arrives&quot; there.  

Instead of looking at herself in the mirror above the produce in the supermarket (which wasn&#039;t the typical mirror excuse for description, as it was meant to show that in Heaven, her beauty mark and little scar, or, identifying characteristics were gone) still, it wasn&#039;t worth the possible stereotyping. So I cut that paragraph completely.

And I&#039;ve been receiving requests for partials and fulls! 

Thank you for a wonderful post and an amazing blog. : ) 

Em</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big thank yous for this post. A writing friend of mine pointed me to it, and I was shocked (like the writers at the conference) that there could be such similarity of ideas across writers, let alone in the first page.</p>
<p>Rather than sighing, it was refreshing to learn what&#8217;s frowned upon in a business that doesn&#8217;t offer much in the way of fedback on rejections. </p>
<p>I immediately made changes to my manuscript&#8217;s first page. For example, instead of my MC dying and &#8220;waking up&#8221; in Heaven, now she dies and &#8220;arrives&#8221; there.  </p>
<p>Instead of looking at herself in the mirror above the produce in the supermarket (which wasn&#8217;t the typical mirror excuse for description, as it was meant to show that in Heaven, her beauty mark and little scar, or, identifying characteristics were gone) still, it wasn&#8217;t worth the possible stereotyping. So I cut that paragraph completely.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;ve been receiving requests for partials and fulls! </p>
<p>Thank you for a wonderful post and an amazing blog. : ) </p>
<p>Em</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.annemini.com/?p=2158&#038;cpage=1#comment-25860</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annemini.com/?p=2158#comment-25860</guid>
		<description>Thanks, John, and welcome!

It IS hard to see submissions from the other side of the desk -- but it&#039;s imperative to try.  I meet good writers all the time who are absolutely convinced that if they revise Ch. 20 just three more times, it will resolve all potential submission problems, but really, by the time an agent has invested the time reach Ch. 20, he&#039;s looking for reasons to accept the manuscript.  And, speaking as an editor, Ch. 20&#039;s writing problems probably crop up earlier in the book as well.  So it&#039;s more strategic for a writer to concentrate revision energy on the first 20 or 50 pages of a manuscript than later on.

The sad thing is that both sides are right here -- plenty of simply marvelous books take a while to warm up but are ultimately very worth reading, and agents are correct that competition for the few annual publication slots is so intense that the editors to whom they will be submitting manuscripts can afford to stop reading as soon as they hit a snag.  In the long run, though, I worry that essentially requiring front-loaded stories will weaken the art form; I think it&#039;s already sapped the expectations for entire-book plotting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, John, and welcome!</p>
<p>It IS hard to see submissions from the other side of the desk &#8212; but it&#8217;s imperative to try.  I meet good writers all the time who are absolutely convinced that if they revise Ch. 20 just three more times, it will resolve all potential submission problems, but really, by the time an agent has invested the time reach Ch. 20, he&#8217;s looking for reasons to accept the manuscript.  And, speaking as an editor, Ch. 20&#8217;s writing problems probably crop up earlier in the book as well.  So it&#8217;s more strategic for a writer to concentrate revision energy on the first 20 or 50 pages of a manuscript than later on.</p>
<p>The sad thing is that both sides are right here &#8212; plenty of simply marvelous books take a while to warm up but are ultimately very worth reading, and agents are correct that competition for the few annual publication slots is so intense that the editors to whom they will be submitting manuscripts can afford to stop reading as soon as they hit a snag.  In the long run, though, I worry that essentially requiring front-loaded stories will weaken the art form; I think it&#8217;s already sapped the expectations for entire-book plotting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.annemini.com/?p=2158&#038;cpage=1#comment-25858</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 06:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annemini.com/?p=2158#comment-25858</guid>
		<description>Great stuff.  Its tough sometimes to stop and think about how hard it is for an agent to pick and choose the works they need to devote their time to.  I guess all writers like to think that their story is so compelling that even if it takes a while to set up that it will be worth reading in the end.  Just not the case in the modern world, is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff.  Its tough sometimes to stop and think about how hard it is for an agent to pick and choose the works they need to devote their time to.  I guess all writers like to think that their story is so compelling that even if it takes a while to set up that it will be worth reading in the end.  Just not the case in the modern world, is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.annemini.com/?p=2158&#038;cpage=1#comment-25794</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annemini.com/?p=2158#comment-25794</guid>
		<description>Welcome, Frumiousb!  This list does seem to inspire more than its fair share of sighs, now that you mention it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome, Frumiousb!  This list does seem to inspire more than its fair share of sighs, now that you mention it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frumiousb</title>
		<link>http://www.annemini.com/?p=2158&#038;cpage=1#comment-25791</link>
		<dc:creator>frumiousb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 12:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annemini.com/?p=2158#comment-25791</guid>
		<description>Just recently started reading your blog, and this is a great list-- even if sigh-inspiring as I consider my latest story. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just recently started reading your blog, and this is a great list&#8211; even if sigh-inspiring as I consider my latest story. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.annemini.com/?p=2158&#038;cpage=1#comment-25748</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annemini.com/?p=2158#comment-25748</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s all right, Sandra; it happens all the time.  For people used to Anns, the continental spelling Anne often scans as Annie (the sun&#039;ll come out/tomorrow, etc.).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s all right, Sandra; it happens all the time.  For people used to Anns, the continental spelling Anne often scans as Annie (the sun&#8217;ll come out/tomorrow, etc.).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
